Wed. Jul 17th, 2019

More confusion over the fate of Botswana’s elephants

President Mokgweetsi Masisi of Botswana categorically denies that his government would ever cull elephants, contradicting the Parliamentary Report proposing culling.

more confusion over the fate of botswanas elephants - More confusion over the fate of Botswana’s elephants

IMG 0526 e1548153807947 - More confusion over the fate of Botswana’s elephants

The views expressed in this article are not necessarily those of The South African

However, Minister of Environment and Natural Resources, Conservation and Tourism, Kitso Mokaila now proposes elephant “cropping”.

To cull or not to cull

Masisi stated to Bloomberg that “in the debate around elephants and our environmental stewardship, we have been misconstrued and misunderstood. To suggest that the irresponsible and reckless words like culling were ever used. We are never for culling. We will not cull.”

This statement flies in the face of the report
produced by his Cabinet Sub Committee
on Hunting Ban Social Dialogue that
recommended among others lifting the hunting ban, culling of elephants, and the
canning of elephant meat as pet food.

The Hunting Ban Social Dialogue report is based on consultation
meetings with only some rural communities affected by the 2014 hunting ban, but
strangely excludes the tourism industry and its beneficiary communities.
Tourism is the second largest GDP earner in Botswana after diamonds, however
the industry appears to have been cowed by threats, such as “you
must remember where your bread is buttered and support us
” made by Mokaila.

It also seems odd that President Masisi takes advice from the controversial hunter Ron Thomson, who applauded Masisi’s highly criticised elephant management proposals. Thomson claims to have personally slaughtered 5,000 elephants (and supervised the killing of many 1,000s more), 800 buffalo, 600 lions, and 50 hippos, but refuses to be part of a televised debate that includes an opposing voice.

In a UK interview with Piers Morgan, he admitted, shouting in a more and more enraged manner, that he “felt nothing” killing the animals, he was “highly efficient at it”, and his lack of emotion helped him “get the job done”.

A supposedly ethical hunter, who has previously boasted of
killing 32 elephants in one go and stating that killing animals gave him a
“thrill”, Thomson made
unsubstantiated claims in another interview
that Botswana’s elephants “now
number between 10 and 20 times the sustainable carrying capacity of their
habitats”.

According to the African
Elephant Status Report 2016
, Botswana’s population has shown a 14% decline
since 2006 and the latest
Botswana elephant census
estimates the country’s current population to be
around 126,000 elephants, which is well within accepted norms.

Despite popular opinions, the Chobe elephant population is
showing a long-term
downward trend
since 2010 and Botswana’s bull elephant population is also decreasing,
especially in the four poaching hotspots. The latter trend will be exacerbated
by trophy hunting, as the more mature bulls are the main target for trophy
hunters.

“Bulls only reach their prime between 40-50 years of age and these musth bulls siring about 90% of all offspring”, says Audrey Delsink (Wildlife Director – HSI Africa).

“Elephant societies are also dependent on these older members for social and ecological knowledge. The removal of just a few of these key individuals will have long-lasting negative consequences for future elephant generations.”

“Ethical” trophy hunting

Proposals for lifting the trophy hunting ban are still on
the table. Mokaila recently stated, when addressing Ngamiland community trusts
in Maun, that should the government reinstate trophy hunting this will be
conducted “ethically”.

We have however witnessed too many examples of unethical and
often illegal trophy hunts in Southern Africa, all clouded in a lack of accountability
and transparency.

Excessive
hunting quotas, overhunting
, and unethical
trophy hunting practices
in the 1980-90s in Botswana, led to a rapid
decline in wildlife populations in many parts of the country, some of which
have never fully recovered. The lion population was particularly badly affected
with some areas reduced to a ratio of nearly six mature females for every
mature male, leading to serious conservation threats such as inbreeding and
kleptoparasitism (when lionesses and subadults are unable to defend and therefore
regularly lose their kill to hyenas).

This situation led to the Botswana government putting a
moratorium on lion hunting in 2001, which was reversed in 2004 under pressure
from the US Government. The former President George Bush Snr, a prominent
member of the Safari Club International, wrote
to the Botswana authorities pleading to lift the ban
, who eventually capitulated.
The moratorium was reinstated in 2008 and remains in place to date.

More recently, Cecil the lion was illegally hunted in
Zimbabwe. This 13-year old lion wearing a GPS research collar was lured
with bait out of Hwange National Park, so that hunter Walter Palmer, who had
previously been convicted
of illegal hunting in the States
, could kill this protected lion without
consequences for either him or the professional hunter, Theo Badenhorst, who
was subsequently arrested for attempting to illegally export sable from
Zimbabwe.

These are just a few from the many examples available in the
public domain, clearly illustrating the hunting industry’s inability to
maintain ethical standards.

Furthermore, Botswana is considering reintroducing trophy
hunting at a time when “facts and indicators reveal a very rapid decline in big
game hunting in Africa”, according to Dr Bertrand Charadonnet (Protected Areas
and Wildlife Consultant) in his report Reconfiguring
the Protected Areas in Africa
.

In Africa, the
Economists at Large
calculated that trophy hunting spending only makes up
on average 1.9% of the overall tourism spending and a recent report from
Namibia shows the limitations
of the economic benefits of trophy hunting
.

The long-term sustainability of trophy hunting is highly
debatable from an ethical, ecological and financial point of view.

Human-elephant conflict

“Harbouring the largest elephant population in Southern African has led to escalating Human-Elephant Conflict (HEC)”, the government claims.

There is no doubt that HEC is a real problem in Botswana that needs addressing. A report on Problem Animal Control data in the Chobe District recorded about 1,300 HEC incidences between 2006-17, i.e. about 100 per year, including crop and garden raiding, property damage, and personal threats to human lives. The report states that HEC is not increasing however 2016 shows an anomaly with 300 reports, dropping back to previous levels in 2017.

84a8affc eleph - More confusion over the fate of Botswana’s elephants

Sensationalist
reports
are serving to inflame an already tragic situation and seek to show
trophy hunting as the solution for elephant population control and the key to solve
HEC.

However, “trophy hunting, cannot, or rather should not have much effect on local elephant densities”, says Dr Keith Lindsay (Conservation Biologist – Amboseli Trust for Elephants). “Otherwise, the trophy-sized animals will not be there for the hunters to shoot. So, trophy hunting does not have any direct effect on reducing HEC”.

With HEC at the forefront of the elephant debate, surprisingly
Mokaila announced recently that his Ministry plans
to stop HEC compensation
, as “communities are capable of coming up with
solutions for addressing HEC themselves”. Is this possibly a cynical ploy to
force communities to support trophy hunting?

Elephant commoditisation

Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe submitted a joint
proposal to CITES
to amend the listing of the African elephant to allow for
trade in live animals, registered raw ivory, hunting trophies for non-commercial
purposes and elephant products.

This blatant commodification of elephants is what the Kavango-Zambezi
Trans-Frontier Conservation Area bloc so elegantly call a “scientific
wildlife management system
”.

Amidst the many contradictions around the fate of Botswana’s
elephants, its government hosted an Elephant Summit earlier this month and from
Masisi’s opening address it is quite clear that the commoditisation of wildlife
and elephants in particular are his main concern. This is “sold” to the people
of Botswana as the solution to HEC and a sustainable way to secure the livelihoods
of local people.

All the shenanigans of the past few months that should be leading
to a future elephant management plan that is good for Botswana’s people and its
wildlife, seems to be nothing more than an election campaign for Masisi to
appeal to rural voters, as well as preparation for the forthcoming CITES CoP18
meeting.

Meanwhile, the verdict on lifting the trophy hunting ban is still pending with no indication when a decision will be made.

conservationaction.co.za

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *